Friday, 25 October 2013

New Beginner's Video From GM Susan Polgar

So you're new to chess. Maybe you've learned the basics like how each piece moves, and maybe even things like castling and opening principles about controlling the centre of the board. Now you want to move forward but the next step up the ladder of chess skill isn't clear?

This is a common problem. Most beginners think that after learning the rules to chess, they then should start at the beginning; the opening. Wrong.

What you need to do first is to learn to walk. That means learning the basic 'language' of logic in chess upon which everything else is built upon. From openings to much else besides.
Image From The Chess Club

Here is what you should be looking to work on: skewers, forks, discovered checks, smothered mates, forced play, decoys and pins.

These aren't tricks or gimmicks that unscrupulous players use, it's the standard method of operation. Along with this you should also be working on exchange puzzles and mate-in-one problems. Learning, training yourself to see these when, and if, they arise in a game is key to chess success.

There are a few learning resources I've recommended on this blog that will help you get off the ground, but now we can happily add another one, a new vid from one of the greatest female chess grand masters of all time, Susan Polgar!

In the first ten minutes, GM Polgar covers things like the importance of controlling the centre and not bringing the queen out too early, if you already know that stuff, just skip to 10min30 for the tactics.




Looks good and well worth taking the time to watch, but I haven't seen the full 3 hour thing yet. It would be interesting to see how much she covers in the DVD.


http://www.onlinechesslessons.net/shop/volume-6-winning-chess-the-easy-way-in-las-vegas-secrets

Wednesday, 23 October 2013

The Chess Beginner: No Man's Land...

The Opening? I Wouldn't Start From There If I Were You

-----------------------------------------------------------

If you want to skip to the recommendation on what to study next after learning basic game principles like controlling the centre and how each piece moves (including the moves like castling, the fiancetto, and en passant) just scroll down to 'The Solution'
-------------------------------------------------------------------

About 15 years ago (late '90s) I was a chess enthusiast. It lasted for a couple of years. During that time I gained a lot of playing experience with my Kasparov talking chess board (before the internet!), but after having decided that I really liked the game I wanted to take things further. 

So with lots of enthusiasm I went out and joined a chess club, bought a ton of books and even had a few lessons from a chess coach. All to no avail. My efforts yielded little and the returns were next to nil. I remained a complete novice and was obliterated in every game I played in my chess club. I went and asked the club organiser what I should do (he was also a chess coach and tried to show me a couple of things), but I didn't really understand his advice. It was clear he was used to teaching a calibre of player way above that of my own level.

Some of the books I bought were by Jeremy Silman, and even though this was clearly an author and teacher with few peers, he seemed to be describing solutions to bad habits that I hadn't even had a chance to develop yet! I really was nowhere. In no man's land... Eventually my enthusiasm fizzled out and I stopped playing.

Since starting to play chess again this time around, I again wanted to get somewhere and figured I needed to start at the start and learn as many openings as possible.


The good chess books tell us that memorising the openings by themselves is wrong and that we should learn the principles behind the openings. However with each move in an opening, there's a different strategy, a different game that will result from even the smallest of variations. (Think of the difference between the Ruy Lopez, Italian and Scotch openings)

Over on Jeff Blackmer's blog, he describes this complexity perfectly:

"...it’s a curious thing to study grandmaster level chess. It is played at such a high level. The lines of play are well known, studied and analyzed twenty moves deep. Positions are scrutinized for any possible advantage. And so, as you study a chess game played on this level, you witness a curious thing. On move 37 white wins a pawn…black resigns. What?"
Chess is a complicated affair and we all know that you have to learn to walk before you can run. The problem is how do you learn to walk? Each opening is a complex composition of moves, a symphony of strategies, ideas and counter-ideas, really too much to take in in the beginning. 

From my experience, even having tried to learn the principles behind the openings, my playing was still poor because there was something else that I needed to learn first.
From Batsford Chess Openings: 350 pages of THIS to memorise?
Good luck with that!

Recently, I found a fascinating article from a British newspaper that really got to the crux of defining chess and why it's so hard/fascinating. Dr. Tobias Galla, senior lecturer in physics at Manchester Uni. said:

‘A ten-year-old can probably figure out how not to lose in noughts and crosses, so there’s a strategy that makes sure you don’t lose. Once you’ve found that strategy, the game is uninteresting, you stop playing it. That’s an equilibrium point. Once you’ve reached that point, you don’t play any more. With these [chess] games with lots of different moves, it’s not so easy to guess these best strategies.

Like the noughts and crosses example illustrates, imagine just learning some moves of a noughts and crosses game, without being told the strategy. Not really hard, and it's pretty easy to see the strategy. So although the chess books tell us that we need to learn the principles behind the openings, it's the principles (strategies) themselves that are also too rich and varied for the beginner to start with. This might be harder for more advanced players (and some coaches?) to appreciate.

The Solution

There is a basic chess vocabulary (if you like), which we need to become fluent in as the next step up the ladder after learning how each piece moves. Just like learning a language after you learn the alphabet, you need to learn to spell words before we get into describing thoughts (found in openings, mid-games), we need to build a vocabulary first. This vocabulary on the chess board is about learning the basic rules of engagement: calculating how two or more pieces can work together to attack or defend, learning what pins, skewers, forks, and discovered checks are; how to manipulate your opponent (forced moves), and so on (GM Susan Polgar has a great new video on these topics). The greater our vocabulary, the stronger our play will be (and like much else in chess and language, you never stop learning). 

In the beginning, it's about learning the best move order in any given exchange, as well as some basic end game mating patterns like two rooks and a king against a king. Or king and queen against a king.

Learning these is really about learning to see this stuff on the board (it also helps you not to be caught out by them from your opponents!). Without these basic building blocks, your play will lack the glue to hold all the other stuff together.

Seeing these basic concepts and understanding them takes time and work, but during that process you're becoming familiar with the rules of engagement. Just like learning a language, in time it will become more fluent. Don't worry if this seems like a lot of work. The fact that these little exercises aren't rocket science to grasp, means you can work through them and pick them up quite quickly. More importantly, you'll be progressing at a much faster rate as opposed to struggling with a huge first step as you try and jump up several rungs on the ladder by starting out with openings.

You can also do puzzles like Mate In Two or Three moves. Or searching for puzzles about pins, skewers, forks etc. (Just recommended a great free tactics site for just such practice the other day.)

When will you be ready to move onto openings? The only answer I can give is when you're ready. You should start learning openings fairly soon, but don't try too much too soon. Watch a good openings instruction video. As time passes by and you learn more, you'll be more comfortable with the information and won't feel bogged down. But (quite maddeningly I'm sure) just learning openings by their names (Giuocco, 4 Knights etc.) isn't the best way to go about it. More on that in a later post.

The best advice I can give is to work from a book or two, if you're in the initial stages of learning or teaching. Here are two great books which have helped me immensely and are very well thought out (they start out gently, and while Polgar's book is diagrams only, the Learn Chess book explains the concepts well and builds in increasing levels of difficulty). (Reviews coming soon.)


Learn Chess by Alexander and Beach

Chess by  László Polgár



Just want to say: my purpose in writing this article isn't to generalise and put chess coaches down. My experience may have just been an unlucky one. I'm sure there are many good chess coaches out there and I just happened to stumble on the wrong ones for me.

Maybe it's similar to music, you don't start learning to play the violin from an internationally acclaimed virtuoso. You start with the millions of other teachers out there and work with them until you reach a level where you're ready to learn from the master.

Interesting Chess Facts

There are 400 different possible positions after one move each. 
There are 72,084 different possible positions after two moves each. 
There are over 9 million different possible positions after three moves each. 
There are over 318 billion different possible positions after four moves each. 
The number of distinct 40-move games in chess is far greater than the number of electrons in the observable universe. The number of electrons is approximately 10^79 , while the number of unique chess games is 10^120.
And even more impressive is the fact that I manage to pick the wrong move each time :P

Monday, 21 October 2013

Beginner's Chess Psychology With 'The Backyard Professor'


Okay, is this the most excitable chess player out there?? lol

Gotta love this guy's enthusiasm! He really made me laugh.

This guy is probably around the 1300ELO level (?), but the video is understandable to players even well below that ranking because he talks us through the moves in a simple and entertaining way. What drama!

He also shows us how being intimidated can destroy our play. But my favourite thing is showing how just one wrong move can make all the difference. This happens a lot in chess and is one of my favourite things about the game. Just take a look at this for a great example of a turnaround!





One thing: at the end he says watch the video several times. I disagree. If you need to watch it again by all means do, but the moves aren't spectacular. There are several questionable moves played by both sides. But this is more about the play, which was brilliantly done.

What he's really saying is that he woke up half way through and started looking for the possibilities for the tactics that enabled him to turn the game around, namely forks, pins, discovered checks, and when he got into that nasty fork with the opponent's knight, he simply looked for a weakness, formed a plan and counter-attacked.

Friday, 18 October 2013

Analysis-o-rama!


Just found a groovy site fullll of chess puzzles for the beginner (and upwards), coupled with decent GUI (graphical user interface)!

At least I know now where I'll be over the next 3,402,374,309,857,234,075 weekends! 

A rival website, Chess.com, has tons of features and is far better overall, but as a free member of Chess.com, you can only practice 3 tactic problems per day. If you log out of chess.com, you can do ten puzzles per day. Neither of these is really enough, if you're serious about improving. So make sure to visit chesstempo.com frequently!

In the meantime, here's an example from the site: the classic kind of chess logic I love so much

Black's knight moved to e4 attacking white's queen on c3. Note that white already has a rook on c8 being attacked by black's queen on b7...


What should white do? Have a think before you scroll down for the answer. Get out your board and set up the position if you like. 

White to mate in two moves.

The answer is a combination of sacrifice and manipulated play (via checking the king).

Answer: rook takes f8+

...and black has no other option but to take the rook (king takes f8), the king can't move anywhere else (because of the white queen on c3), can't take the rook with any other piece and can't block the checking rook.

King takes rook on f8



...and now the king is totally trapped. The executioner's final hammer blow, white queen to h8, checkmate.


Beautiful. clever and simple.

Challenge, Accepted!


We have a page on Facebook. Join us!

So what's all this then?

What's this blog for?

I recently read a claim that 90% of the world's chess players are below the ranking of ELO 1600. As such this blog is about trying to help the average chess player (like myself) up the ratings ladder by sharing my own thoughts and ideas about how to progress.

Most chess players are a certain kind of animal. All they want to do is learn about the games of the grand masters, and play chess. If they don't do that, they think they're not improving.

Chess is a competitive game but it's also about competing against ourselves. We compete against ourselves when we compare our playing to how we were last month, last year or last tournament. As such, it's just as much about our inner world (hence the name of the blog, the inner game of chess). Most of us don't have the memory of a Fischer or a Kasparov. Therefore we have to be careful about how we spend our time learning in order to maximise the benefits.

Thankfully, there are plenty of blogs and sites out there with chess news from around the world and games of the grand masters, so I'll be leaving that to the experts. This blog is about sharing my inner journey trying to find a way forward; It's about motivation and the journey we all go through which I hope you'll find useful too.

I'm a sub-1000 ELO player having started to play again after many years away from the board. So being a novice player, you might ask, what useful information can I offer?

I know about learning. It was a crucial part of my life having been a professional musician and later taught music to others for many years. I learned that being a good player isn't enough to make you a good teacher. You have to be both. The same is true in Chess.

While I'm sure I can't offer more advanced chess players any useful advice about their play, equally there are many high level players/coaches who have forgotten what it's like to be a beginner (this I witnessed myself). This is another key motivation for wanting to write.

Having been through the many difficulties of trying to learn a musical instrument, at a beginning level and many years later, at a higher level of musicianship, there's one thing that is of key importance: if a player (chess or music) hasn't got the right foundations, s/he will hit an invisible ceiling and progress will suddenly plateau. This isn't because they need to learn something even more advanced, but there are some holes in their playing through having missed some basics (they've memorised several openings and their variations without having learned the opening principles, for example). With every player, what they need to learn in order to progress varies. This is part of the journey; not only moving forward, but understanding what we need to learn.

The perfect example are the many players out there who don't even realise, amazingly enough, that just playing games alone isn't the best way to improve. You have to sit down with a book and study, and not just any book, the right book for you! Even Bobby Fischer paid his dues and studied!

The last time I was interested in chess, none of this even occurred to me and I wasted a lot of time and money on educational materials (lots of opening books and lessons with coaches) but not really improving.

This blog will, hopefully, help players in a similar situation out. I will also try and provide some insights for those parents of aspiring young chess players. I'll try and keep my writing human sounding and not too technical. I just want to do my bit to encourage others and share my love of this beautiful game with everyone.

Most importantly, if you have any suggestions; if anyone comments and asks any questions and you know the answer, please write! Input from others makes it all worthwhile.

With my meanderings around the net I'll be posting sites that are useful, reviews of chess books and videos, and other (hopefully) interesting tid bits.

May the fiancetto be with you!